Answers.
1st. NO
2nd. YES
Regards
Divyanshu
Re: SLDCHECK error Functional call returned exception code 3
↧
↧
Contract start date not replicating from header to item
Hi All,
I am facing the issue in Service Contracts component, when i change the contract start date and contract end date at header level, only contract end date is changing at item level but contract start date is not changing. This issue am facing after crm upgrade from 7.0 to ehp3. I have checked the date profile settings and it looks fine.
Can anyone please help me with the issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Chiru
↧
How to add help documentation in a module pool screen?
Hi ,
I have to add documentation for a module pool screen. I have added the documentation for the program in se38 but what can I do to make it visible on the screen I have designed.
Since I am new to module pool, kindly explain me step by step.
Thanks,
Nidhi
↧
Re: Web Service Publisher
Did you save the report first in BO repository before publishing ?
Also, install fiddler and check for any network related issue.
↧
Re: Side effect report for EHP upgrade
Matt Fraser and Susan Haenicke already answered a similar query here with the SMP link.
Request for Side Effect Report
You should make use of that and come back with questions.
Probably they can give you more suggestions.
RB
↧
↧
Re: Dispaly one dimension on chart out of three dimensions
Hi Tammy,, I think i replied on Jul 18, 2014 11:14 PM. It has screenshot that shows hover over.
↧
Cenvat claering account
Hi ,
Under the TAXINN tax procedure configuration.
Lets say i have created a Tax code V1 - excise duty 12+ 2+ 2 and VAT 5 % maintaining the condition types.
Know under the GL assignment for TAX code gl assigned is 2XXXXXXX Cenvat clearing account
is this GL account same as what used for MM excise invoice.
Excise duty Dr
Cess duty Dr
Hcess Duty Dr
Cenvat clearing account Cr. ( 2XXXXXXXX )
Do reply back .
With regards,
krishna Singareddy
↧
Re: SAP GRC AC: Functional Areas and Point of Contact
Dear Sara,
according to definition Point of Contact is an approver for a specific Functional Area. Functional Area is an attribute used to categorize users and roles.
First of all you need to assign a user to role Point of contact in Access Control Owners application.
Next you can use them in MSMP configuration as using following FM: GRAC_MSMP_POINT_CONTACT_AGENT.
Let me know, if you require further assistance,
Filip
↧
Re: best option to change sales order
Thanks for reply , but can you add explanation too with this suggestion, which one i should look for
USEREXIT_NEW_PRICING_VBAP in the program MV45AFZB or
BAPI_SALESORDER_CHANGE in SE37 for Sales order: Change Sales Order.
Where you can set flag "X" for PRICING in import parameter LOGIC_SWITCH for update of price in the given sales order..
I am new with this stuff and really dont understand difference in these 2 functionality.
My requirement is simple, want to update 100 sales order with configuration value and then reprice them and save.
Thanks
Paul
↧
↧
Re: GRC 10-Point of Contacts by Departments
Dear Sara,
according to definition Point of Contact is an approver for a specific Functional Area. Functional Area is an attribute used to categorize users and roles.
First of all you need to assign a user to role Point of contact in Access Control Owners application.
Next you can use them in MSMP configuration as using following FM: GRAC_MSMP_POINT_CONTACT_AGENT.
Let me know, if you require further assistance,
Filip
↧
Re: REPOSITORY SYNC
Hi Neeraj,
Parameter 2050 is already set to YES.
↧
Re: Side effect report for EHP upgrade
Hello Shiv,
Please check the link :
https://websmp108.sap-ag.de/side-effects
All the available options are listed.
Regards,
Gaurav
↧
Charge Events calculation
Hello All,
I need to calculate charge events based on 3 fields BIN, Look_up_code & Power Drawn .
For each Bin, we need to consider "LOOKUPCODE" & "Power Drawn" columns. LOOKUPCODE contains values like CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT, CSOC_FULL_ALERT, PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT & CHARGE_PAUSE_ALERT.
"Power Drawn" contain numeric values.
Order of Priority of the Lookup Codes
Charge_Begin_Alerts
CSOC_FULL_ALERT,
PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT
CHARGE_PAUSE_ALERT
Scenario 1. If there is One CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT for a BIN but Powerdraw is zero. | ||||
LOOKUPCODE | MESSAGEID | BIN | INSERTED | Powerdraw |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247997 | 1FADP5CU5DL542052 | 18-MAY-14 03.15.33.060296 AM | 0 |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247997 | 1LADP5CU5DL549999 | 19-MAY-14 03.15.33.060296 AM | 34 |
|
| |||
Eliminates 1FADP5CU5DL542052 and counts only 1LADP5CU5DL549999
|
|
|
|
|
Scenario 2. If there is more than one CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT for a BIN but both have CHARGERPOWERDRAW=0 | ||||
LOOKUPCODE | MESSAGEID | BIN | INSERTED | Powerdraw |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247997 | 1FADP5CU5DL542052 | 18-MAY-14 03.15.33.060296 AM | 0 |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247997 | 1FADP5CU5DL542052 | 18-MAY-14 03.15.33.060296 AM | 0 |
System Returns: Eliminate both Charge Begin alerts for 1FADP5CU5DL542052 | ||||
Scenario 3. If there is two CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT for a BIN but No End PoInt then eliminate the First one. | ||||
|
| |||
LOOKUPCODE | MESSAGEID | BIN | INSERTED | Powerdraw |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247469 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.01.141382 AM | 28 |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247685 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.36.652666 AM | 28 |
PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT | 135247552 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.16.527631 AM | 0 |
CSOC_FULL_ALERT | 135247656 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.33.490437 AM | 28 |
|
| |||
System Returns: Eliminates the First one and Analyse the second one onwards | ||||
Scenario 4. Comparing 2 CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT for the same BIN and we find an PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT, CSOC_FULL_ALERT, or CHARGE_PAUSE_ALERT between them: Which CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT is eliminated? * | ||||
Order of Priority of the Lookup Codes Between two Charge Begin Alerts is 1 CSOC_FULL_ALERT, 2 PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT ,3 CHARGE_PAUSE_ALERT | ||||
LOOKUPCODE | MESSAGEID | BIN | INSERTED | Powerdraw |
PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT | 135247330 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.13.39.459307 AM | 0 |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247469 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.01.141382 AM | 28 |
PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT | 135247552 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.16.527631 AM | 0 |
CSOC_FULL_ALERT | 135247656 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.33.490437 AM | 28 |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247685 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.16.36.652666 AM | 28 |
|
| |||
System Returns: | ||||
|
| |||
Between the two Charge Begin Alerts look for COSC Full_Alert --Is it > 60 seconds from the CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT time stamp. If it is No(in this case) then look for PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT . Is it > 60 seconds from the CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT time stamp.. If No (In this Case) then Look for CHARGE_PAUSE_ALERT . Is it > 60 seconds from the CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT time stamp. No in this case... Then we delete the first CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT . If this is the only one for the BIN for the time frame then it is not counted. | ||||
Scenario 5. Comparing 3 CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT for the same BIN and we find an PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT, CSOC_FULL_ALERT, or CHARGE_PAUSE_ALERT between them: Which CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT is eliminated? * | ||||
LOOKUPCODE | MESSAGEID | BIN | INSERTED | Powerdraw |
PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT | 135247330 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.13.39.459307 AM | 0 |
CHARGE_BEGIN_ALERT | 135247431 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.01.141382 AM | 28 |
PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT | 135247532 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.16.527631 AM | 0 |
PLUG_CHANGE_ALERT | 135247633 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.14.33.490437 AM | 28 |
CSOC_FULL_ALERT | 135247534 | 3FA6P0SU2DR373669 | 18-MAY-14 03.15.16.527631 AM | 0 |
Check for CSOC FULL first, difference between CSOC FULL and CHARGE BEGIN is > 60 so it is endpoint. It means we got 1 charge event for a particular BIN |
First check CSOC FULL, it is <60 so then check PLUG CHANGE, also < 60 so then check CHARGE PAUSE, also <60 so CHARGE BEGIN is deleted |
|
|
Best Regards
Sandeep
↧
↧
Re: Special Depreciation is not calculating on Additions
Any Updates team
↧
Workflow completing on Deleted event but workitem still active
I have a couple of different FI workflows with forks with 3 branches...1 being necessary. One branch is approval and the other two are change and deleted events which should completed workflow if either are raised. Both of them are basically the same layout:
These workflows have only recently started having problems. Sometimes when the deleted event is raised, the workflow is completed but the approval workitem remains in process in the users inbox:
I checked the transaction log and some work and some do not. I looked in ST22 but didnt see any errors that look related. Looking through the workflow log itself, everything seems normal except the approval workitem doesnt logically delete when the workflow is completed. I also looked at any execution times that might coincide with the document delete time and didnt really see anything that might point to an enqueue problem.
Has anyone else experienced anything like this?
↧
Re: Shift Note configuration
Hi Rajesh,
Copy the existing screen (Shift note) and name as screen 130 (Shift note)& screen 130 (Shift note)
and check screen (Shift note) will appear
Regards,
Kabil
↧
Re: Multi Item Order in DIMP with out APO
Hi,
This is Krishna came for Implementation of PET Films having same problem.Since slit optimization based production of Jumbo & Primary slit need to be carried i have developed a Z where sales order based optimization & manual production order against combined sales order is done & keeping all optimized data in Z Tables.Fetching same at time of GR.
Regards,
M G Krishna
↧
↧
Re: VKOA Configuration Settings
Jitesh,
Thanks for taking the time to reply.
I had tried F1 help before creating the message, but did not get any explanation on the field usage. Can you please explain how to use two different GL accounts with the same combination and what would be the end result?
↧
Requirements while installing patch
HI Exports,
I am using sap Bo 3.1 sp3 ..Now we are planning to install sp7 patch . .
My Queris:
. Before installing ,we need to follow any steps.like(Need to install sp3 or sp4)
. How to install patch and after installing we are going face any issues ?
. IF we are facing any ,issues how to over come this issues
Requirement:
. Could any one share some documents and links
Thanks,
Raghunath
↧
CJ88 and "with order" flag
Hi guru,
if I run CJ88 and set flag "with orders", the system doesn't settle cost from production order / networks to WBS element
Please, could you tell me where I can check in order to fix this problem?
Thanks
Regards
Raffaele
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
