Quantcast
Channel: SCN: Message List
Viewing all 8746 articles
Browse latest View live

Re: Hi, I am interested in SAP, and i would like to know a few things ..can someone answer my questions? Thank you

$
0
0

Dear Muhammad Talha,

 

As according to your age you are thinking so much that is very nice thing. And which filed you are trying that has a great career but for that you need a good training institute who has a great name with good products.

 

As you want to know what is SAP?

 

SAP stands for Systems, Applications and Products mainly in data processing. SAP is the world leader in implementing ERP systems (Enterprise Resource Planning) – ERP 6.0 (EhP6)/ Business Suite R/3 and Business One – which are fully integrated business real-time systems. They enable transactions to be processed end-to-end and eliminate data inconsistencies between sub-systems. Many companies replace their old business systems with the top-of-the-line ERP packages developed by SAP.

 

http://www.koenig-solutions.com/images/koenig-partners/SAP.jpg

 

<<removed by moderator. Do not advertise your company in your posts as it against SCN rules>>

 

Message was edited by: Colleen Lee


Re: Crystal Reports for Visual Stadio 2013

Re: Budget,Actual and committment costs..

How to fix the language warnings after a add-on package is imported?

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am working on a system with NW 7.0 having spam level 7.00/0021. Have imported an add-on package as per

our requirements. Though the package was imported successfully, it left warnings regarding some language as

below.

 

language '1' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language '2' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language '3' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'C' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'F' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'H' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'I' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'J' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'K' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'L' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'M' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'N' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'O' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'P' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'Q' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'R' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'S' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'T' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'U' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'V' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

language 'Z' is installed, but no entries for this language were exported ('DE')

 

Is there any work around to overcome these warnings so that the add-on package import is clean?. Could help by giving suggestions.

 

Thank You In Advance,

 

Regards,

Ram

get rid of stock in WM and stuck in 998

$
0
0

Hello,

 

I have a question which I do not know how to fix.


I am trying to get rid of a stock from the system which is in WM environment, and I used movement 562 via MIGO to get rid of the stock.
Since it is a WM, the -2EA appeared in 998 storage type immediately after the posting. Further, there is no Transfer Request created in the 561 posting.

Please see the following two figures.

 

Questions:how to get rid of the 2EA in the warehouse stock so that this material can become empty in WM? Thanks.

A1.jpg

 

A2.jpg

From Daniel

Is it mandatory to have COGS Account as Cost Element for Account Based COPA

$
0
0

Hi SAP Gurus,

 

Let me start with some back ground for the issue i am facing.

 

Our client does not want to hit the COGS Account during post goods issue on delivery, instead we are using a B/S Clearing Account "Shipped & Invoice Clearing Account" instead of COGS on post goods issue.

 

So, following is the posting on PGI

 

Ship & Invoice Clearing A/c Dr

To  Inventory Account

 

 

Now during Billing we have created one accrual condition which clears the "Ship & Invoice Clearing" Dr & post the amount to COGS account during billing.

 

So, on billing posting is as below :

 

Customer Dr

To Revenue

 

COGS Dr

To Ship & Invoice Clearing A/c

 

 

Note : This is to make sure that there is no time when COGS & Revenue are not in sync due to the time lag in Delivery and Billing.

 

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUE

 

The above was working fine when we tested above for Cost Based COPA, however when we moved to account based COPA it is giving below error during PGI.

 

"Message K/111 Error Occured in Derivation Rule"

 

i.e. system is trying to perform a COPA derivation even for the "Ship & Invoice Clearing A/c", which is a B/S Account.

 

Has anyone faced a similar issue.

 

Also for now, I checked the movement type 601 config in T.code OMWN to see what is the setting for Account Assignment for GBB/VAX it was checked, so I removed it for the time being, but am not sure what impact it might have for other scenarios.

 

 

Thanks,

Ankur

HCI OData Provisioning vs SMP integration Gateway

$
0
0

Hello Friends,

What is the difference between HCI OData Provisioning and SMP integration Gateway.Is HCI OData Provisioning also used to provision OData services from Non OData sources such as ODBC,ABAP RFC etc.if yes ,is there a tutorial or a blog to provision OData services from non OData sources using HCI OData Provisioning.

 

regards

Kaushik

Re: Multilevel Workflow using block

$
0
0

I don't know what FSG is, so I'll try to explain with my own example:

Blocks can be used for parallel processing of approvals when the number of approvers is not known in the beginning of the workflow, lets say a document needs approval per company code in it's items:

If all the items are from company 1000 only it's manger needs to approve,

If there is also an item of company 2000, two managers will need to approve the same step.

you will need to create a table of the distinct company codes for this scenario.

 

Now, for multilevel approval you can calculate the levels in the beginning and then use a loop with an index. or you can use conditions in the workflow template itself if they are not too complicated:

IF FSG = 'X'  true -> second approval step / false->end.


Re: Transfer Order without any Batch Determination

$
0
0

I actually see here other issues and I am not sure if I would like to sanction them by looking for an alternative in picking.

I would like to ask first for what reason your material is batch managed.

If that has to do with quality and expiration dates, then an approach to mix it with older batches, even putting new batches on top of the old batches so that they cannot be picked easily should be restricted, as this practice leads to the fact that only the last batch is picked and the older batch is always left and becomes even older and at some day expired.

Further you should not allow to have the people pick quantities that are already allocated to other TOs, as this automatically leads to corrections in 2 TOs.

 

If you create the TO after/while picking, then you have no corrections. Means if you create the TO by a function module call in the moment you scan it then it should actually work as you want. But this means you will miss another part in the process: the planning of your work.

Re: Sales Order Delivery / Billing block scenario with Workflow

Analysis for Office - Connectivity Issue

$
0
0

I might have stumbled upon an old issue here: I have 64 bit OS, with Office 2013 32 bit client running on it. I want to run Analysis for Office on my machine. For that, I have installed HANA 32 bit client and Analysis for Office 32 bit installation pack. Now when I try to connect to Analysis for Office, I get following error:

 

Analysis for Office - Connectivity Error.jpg

 

Analysis tool-pack (excel add-in) is active and running. Has anyone faced a similar connectivity issue before? And any clue about the resolutions?

 

Thank you.

HT

Re: Item description does not populate on marketing document

Re: TRANSACTION NOTIFICATION EN CONDICIONES DE PAGO DE SN

$
0
0

Hola james, es la variable del campo grupo en la ventana actual de SAP:

 

El query solo valida si el campo "grupo" $[$16.0]  es igual al dato que necesitas seleccionar, si el valor es igual a "tu grupo" asigna -1 (contado) si no, selecciona el valor por default que tiene parametrizado.

 

 

Saludos

Alessandro.

PY Tables

$
0
0

Hi ,

 

Can you plz trough some light on

 

All PY Related tables.

 

1. Input table

         - why we bring wT in this table via PCR

2. Output table

         - - why we bring wT in this table via PCR

3. RT Table

            - - why we bring wT in this table via PCR

4. Cluster (Whole PY Result storing)

5. Other tables if any

 

 

its confusing some time

 

thanks

SK

BI 4.1 SP5

$
0
0

Trying to install BI 4.1 SP5 from marketplace.There are 2 parts for BI 4.1 SP5 server component

 

Part 1 - exe file type - 4 GB

Part 2 - RAR file type - .5 GB

 

How to install?


Re: SAP standard transaction debugging

$
0
0

Hi,

 

It won't always work (eg for V2 updates) but you could try putting a break point on the statement COMMIT WORK. The debugger lets you do that - specify a statement and stop on every occurrence.

 

cheers

Paul

Re: Is there a way to add the creator user name in the Document Journal PLD (form 39) ?

Error Message XU033:Valuation of characteristic for unit of measure IML causes rounding diff.

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

Experts pls suggest me on this.....................


Scenario is


Material 53000081 (has batch specific unit of measure). Base unit of measure is L, litre. Batch specific UOM is  IOU/ml. User will input the IOU value through Inspection characteristics. so for example If the production declares 1 L output. QC gives 150 IOU/ml. the total IOU for this batch is 1 L * 150 * 1000 ml =1,50,000 IOU for this batch. SAP says 1/ (150 * 1000) cannot be more than 5 digit fraction #1/99999#. Is there any way to address this issue, because client wants the base UOM in litre and they will give the IOU/ml value through QC.

 

I have raised a message to SAP on this XU033 error and SAP says as below.


SAP comments:

 

Hi Subramanian,

The root cause is the conversion factor

is more than 5 predecimal places.

Conversion factor= Base unit of measure / Product unit of measure=

1/(1000*100)= 1/100000, which is smaller than #1/99999#

So if you could change the value of characteristic IOU_PER_ML, you may

try to change it to a value smaller than 100 and see if the error

still occurs.

But we still recommend you to reevaluate your unit of measure

according to note 362932. This note contains most of issues about unit

conversion.

Please let us know if you have any further questions.

Best regards,


MyComments after SAP reply


Thanks for the mail.

 

It is a Business requirement to maintain the Base unit of measure in

"litre" L . The IOU cannot be restricted below 100 IOU/ml as there is a

business constraint. Pls suggest I have made the OCHA System attribute

message to blank as per the below instruction from SAP support "Another

alternative is to change the settings of XU033 in transaction

OCHA (menu "Define Attributes of System Messages") from Error to

Warning. But please

make sure together with your local consultant that the restrictions

from note 362932 can be fullfilled at your system".

 

Still the system is throwing error, even if i change the message

attribute.

 

Attached below is the "MB1B debugging screenshot.JPG" from out

technical

consultant.

 

SAP Reply:

Dear Subramanian

some warnings might be possible to change, but this is not possible

for all errors messages. If you don't fulfill the 5-Digit-Fraction

restriction you will get an error very correctly in standard, this

cannot be changed at all, as this is a documented restriction.

The usage of batch specific UOM has some strong restrictions. There is

no possiblity to over come this restrictions. SAP Support cannot tell

you what in detail to do, as this is completly depending on customer

needs, restrictions, data, processes and so one. This need to be

analysed in detail from your local consultant, this cannot be done

within the SAP Support.

My colleagues already provided you much details about the calculation

and refer to the note 362932 which list all necessary informations.


 


BR

Subbu


Re: variables in hana

$
0
0

oh ok great.. thanks Fernando.. lemme try with input parameters..

 

also for suppose i have a variable in calculation view and i want to use it in universe.. can i do it and how?

 

Thanks,

Nujhat.

Re: stock-removal with pick-point process not working

$
0
0

Hi Kumar,


The reason I am using movement type 201 to perform this business process is basically I wanted to tested it out this process base on the explanation in SAP library. I would like to check and to test if the first TO creation will trigger a movement to the pick point location (i.e. storage type 013 in my example).


I am using 201 is because it is faster and quicker way to perform stock removal instead of 601 which require a sales order creation.


Anyway, my whole idea is just want to make sure that when I create the first Tranfer order, the system should reflect goods moved to the pick poing in 013. However, the following of my testing does not seems showing correctly.

 

System setup: I decide to use movement type 251 (GI without sales order) and linked to a customized WM movement types).

A1.jpg

P1.jpg

P2.jpg

P3.jpg

When material document is generated for movement 251 in IM level, R3 not reflect storage type 013 (pick point), instead 910, when the TR is created.

P4.jpg

 

Now when a TO is created, system still propose interim type 910.

P6.jpg

 

I think my setup probably not correct? but I seems not able to find where is the problem on my setup.

Thanks,
Daniel.

Viewing all 8746 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images