Hi Khasim,
Let me know if you need any information regarding this
Regards
Dinesh
Hi Khasim,
Let me know if you need any information regarding this
Regards
Dinesh
Hello,
Have you configured the SIA to use SSL certificates ?
Are both systems using the same certificates (are they taking the same language) ?
Kind regards,
Johan
check the asset class,it should be for investment asset and not the ordinary asset class
also check the investment profile and asset class under it
Dear Experts,
I have created group task list with maintenance strategy and assign packages to number of operations in this task list.I have also created a strategy based maintenance plan using NO type for equipment using this strategy and task list.Now I scheduled the maintenance plan.
In IP24 and IP29 report i can see the notification created by scheduling the maintenance plan,but I am not able to see for which operations available in task list this notifications created.In Ip19 operation short text field is blank so I cant identify the operations for list of notification created for a maintenance plan.
Please guide me how i can achieve this requirement by using this reports.I have try to search for threads but didnt get it.
Regards.
Swapnil
The error am getting is
Uncaught Error: failed to load 'sap/ushell/adapters/abap/SupportTicketAdapter.js' from /sap/bc/ui5_ui5/ui2/ushell/adapters/abap/SupportTicketAdapter.js: 404 - NOT FOUND
I checked the versions of SAPUi5 libraries in development , Quality & Production.
All other file versiona match with Quality & Development but the file
com.sap.ushell.ushell_abap has version 1.16.9 in Production and 1.20.1 in Production. Can this cause an issue??
Tim,
Yes I totally agree with you, security is paramount to any implementation. As for the Portal option, it is really in the context to Madhu's original requirement - mentioning Portal as one option. If the customer already uses it for a gateway or as the word suggests a "portal" to access information from SAP (whichever backend that is) and SSO is active, then extending the benefits of that SSO solution to launch SAPGUI will be very valuable.
SNC is the next thing, as in my previous comment, it is not surprising and is unfortunate that most customers (especially those old ones) did not SNC for SAPGUI from the start.
Anyway other points to ponder on are - for how long would SAPGUI stay relevant, especially when SAP's campaign on new UI technologies - starting with the Business Client (suits well with customers not wanting Java, rendering WDA and WebGUI in seamless client), then on to the new UI5 and Fiori screens, and ultimately to HANA and the cloud (SAP S/4 HANA in particular). Then I guess majority if not all will boil down to one protocol - HTTPS
Kind regards
Donald
hi rishi
u found any solution for this?
because i am getting same problem
Dear Experts,
We are implementing GM-GTE in a University. We wish to maintain one to one relationship between Sponsor and Fund, i.e. only one external fund can be used by a Sponsor. However, when we are creating BP/Sponsor, the external fund which has already been used while creating another sponsor, is appearing as the available external fund for re-use and after processing it is letting us to save the process without giving any error or warning.
How can we restrict it so that fund, which has been used by a Sponsor is not available to re-use while creating another sponsor.
Thanks and Regards,
Amar Lal
Hi,
With the latest BPM API, it is now possible to programmatically cancel a process. This cancelling can either be done by a BPM SuperAdmin, or by a user who is part of the assigned Administrators of that particular process.
Since we only want certain users to cancel a process, but not giving them BPM SuperAdmin rights, I need to suspend the given process, assign that user as an administrator, and then I'm able to have them cancel that process.
I have the following code:
ProcessInstanceManager pim = BPMFactory.getProcessInstanceManager(); URI processUri = new URI(BPM_PROCESS_URI + processId); pim.suspend(processUri); // here I should assign the current user as an administrator to the process, but how?? pim.cancel(processUri);
As you can see from the code, I'm missing the part assigning the currently logged in user as an administrator to the process instance. I've searched the BPEM API back to front, but could not find a method or operation to do so.
As a workaround, a BPM administrator now goes into NWA, assign that user as an administrator to the process, and then the user can cancel their process, but this is far from ideal.
Does anyone know of a programmatically suitable solution?
Thanks in advance!
Robin
hi seif,
As this is logical database everything is managed in the logical database itself.
It is storing in work areas which is defined in the logical database.
Generic rule is, you should inward only the actual received quantity. There could be differences between the invoice Qty mentioned by Vendor and actually received. That is something you need to take up with vendor. Once your counting is done you can do GR and the same will be posted to QI. May be somewhere in GR screen you can capture the invoice quantity to compare later.
I am not sure if this can suit here but have you looked at 2 step GR functionality in SAP that uses 103 and 105 movement? However there could be several other aspects involved from from Material's side. Hence if you can discuss with your MM team, conclusion would be faster.
From QM point of view, the stock will be posted to QI after 105 movement depending upon the configuration. Also there is an option to correct the quantities after inspection lot creation. Explore Correct Actual Quantity tab in change inspection lot mode.
My suggestion - Discussion with MM team for further mapping!
Regards, Anand
You can find answers to your questions here for SP13 :
In Features Content, you have links for all changes related to SP13.
Overall benefits will depends of your actual usage of Solution Manager I would say.
Hi Experts,
I have a question regarding the consumption of bulk materials using HU-management in production.
The business requirement is to be able to consume bulk materials which are already at the production storage location and that the bulk materials are part of the Bill of Material. I have tried this, but it does not seem to work. I get the following behaviour in the system:
1. When staging the materials, it will ignore the bulk components which are already at the production storage location (which is correct)
2. When issuing the components, it will not issue the stock of the bulk components (which is not correct)
What am I ding wrong, or what are my options to cover this scenario?
Thanks for your support!
M
Hi ,
Generation rule is missing for quota type 10 where ESG grouping is 1 and PSA grouping is 02.
Regards,
Sankarsan
hi,
here all non key fields how to write select query?
thanks in advance
Open your thread in other browser tab,you'll be able to close the thread.
Regards,
The software is doing what you've asked rather than what you want
Find a way in your bex query to strip off "period " from the start of the month and the report will simply work. I'm not a bex person, I'm from the traditional BO over a database side of things so wouldn't know the syntax to either replace "period " with nothing or to ignore the first 7 characters of the string if it starts with "period ". Should be simple enough if you know Bex.