Hi Rejoice,
I am not sure but document says that this applies to only transactions FB60, FB65, FB70, FB75 or for parking FV60, FV65, FV70, FV75.
Regards,
Shadab.
Re: screen-exit f-02
↧
↧
Re: Join issue
Can you try the following
SELECT A.SHOW_ROOM,SUM(A.ACTUAL_SALES) AS ACTUAL_SALES,SUM(A.PLAN_SALES) AS PLAN_SALES
FROM
(
SELECT NVL(A.SHOW_ROOM,P.SHOW_ROOM) AS SHOW_ROOM,
SUM(A.ACTUAL_SALES) AS ACTUAL_SALES,SUM(P.PLAN_SALES) AS PLAN_SALES
FROM SALES_ACT A
FULL OUTER JOIN SALES_PLAN P ON A.PERIOD = P.PERIOD AND A.SHOW_ROOM = P.SHOW_ROOWM
GROUP BY A.SHOW_ROOM,P.SHOW_ROOM
) A
GROUP BY A.SHOW_ROOM;
Regards,
Nithin
↧
Re: Usage Decision = Material transfer
Hi Yaz,
I think, you should have the Business Process Mapping List (BPML) explaining your As-Is / To-Be business process well, before you try thinking about QM part to be implemented. The main idea for this platform is to share thoughts or suggestions on some blocking points to help users, whereas you are asking us to fix a process for you!! I believe that this approach is not correct.
Well, saying that I still would like to share some high level thoughts on your To-Be process -
High Level Process Flow -
i) For this case, when you do GR form ProdOrd (Insp type 04) is created, and stock is posted in quality stock. Material MvT 101 is linked to inspection type 04 linked to it.
[Prerequisite - inspection type 04 is linked to the material.]
ii) Perform Result Recording for all MICs flicked form inspection plan.
iii) If any MIC result is out of tolerance, please create a defect, and use the 'Activate' option to generate a Notification linked to it.
[Prerequisite - you have to maintain the link for inspection type 04 & notification type Q3 or any custom type]
iv) Perform UD = R and put the stock to blocked stock.
[Prerequisite - check if the posting proposal VMENGE04 (with right index) is linked to the "R" UD code, and stock posting in background is selected in QS51 for your plant.]
v) Create Rework Order Type in PP and confirm that order. Here, reworked material is the same material code, but you may have used additional components to fix this. So you can check issuing additional components with MvT 261.
vi) Do stock posting form Blocked to Quality using MvT 349. It should create an inspection lot of type "08".
[Prerequisite - Material master has inspection type 08 added to it before you perform this step. It will automatically pick the same inspection plan you have used for inspection type 04].
vii) Record inspection results for this new inspection lot (type 08) for the reworked material, in quality.
viii) Complete the previously created Quality Notification, which got created at the background by selecting "Activate" icon. Set it's system status as "NOCO...."
ix) Now if the material is found to be OK, Use UD = A
[Prerequisite - Check that posting proposal VMENGE01 is linked to the UD code with background stock posting activated]
x) If still you found that the results are out of specification, Use another UD code for "Reject", where the posting proposal VMENGE06 is linked to it. This should post the material to SCRAP material code.
[Prerequisite - please check that background stock posting is compliant for the UD code]
xi) Finally, scrap the material using MvT 551/553/555.
Thanks,
Arijit
↧
Re: identifiy the job/user session which are causing the lock entry overflow
Hi vivek.
1. To find the user session & Terminal name use the transaction code AL08 - search the user id.
2. To find the background job use the transaction code SM37 with user name. and also use check the transaction code SM66 - global work-press status
3. To find the number of lock enter use the transaction code SM12 with user id. Refer the SDN link about lock enters overflow.
Regards
SS
↧
Creating Valuation Type for Materials (Mass)
Hi
How can I mass create new valuation type for materials? The situation is like this: I have "PRODUCTION" Val. type for all FERT mats. now I wanna create "CONSIGNING" val. type with price 1.00 for all of them.
Thanks
↧
↧
Re: Unable to activate Subcontracting switch AD_SUB in SFW1
Hi Pratap,
If A&D is there is SFW5 , you can activate it. When you try to activate it system will do a default check for conflicts. If there are no conflicts , it will schedule a background for activation. If you have further doubts , how to activate better take the help of basis guys.
Thanking you
Vengaiah
↧
Re: CS03 component qty and CS11 not matching
Hi Rupesh,
Thank you so much for your time!
I checked round off but its not maintained in my case hence the note seems not releavant here.
Is there any thing which I am still missing?
Also, In CS03, current component qty=(Required qty/base qty)*saved component qty. I want to know what is saved component qty in this ?
I have tried the same scenario in Q* system where the CS11 and CS03 are matching exactly.
Kindly guide me.
Kind Regards,
Anand
↧
Re: PR have been approved even purchase group and plant belong to different company code
Please understand that the classification is used to determine the strategy - only - full stop.
It is either found or not found, which means you either have something to approve or it is not to be approved at all.
No validation with error messages at this place in standard.
You are actually far a away for your initial problem. It was that an approver had approved a PR from another plant.
Now you are gambling in an area where you want send error messages to a requisitioner if he enters a wrong purchasing group.
the purchasing group is entered in a material master, this way the user does not need to care about entering a purchasing group when creating a requisition, it is automatically defaulted.
The release strategy is used to determine the release code.
The release code is the signature of an approver, and is assigned to him via roles.
So either your strategy is wrong or the authorization of the approver is wrong.
↧
Re: Net requirement calculation in Strategy 40
Hello,
In that case system will consider the stock of 120 to total demand is 100+60 = 160
160 Demand-120 stock = - 40 demand so MRP will generate planned order of 40.
You could very well test in your quantity system.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar
↧
↧
Re: Temporary table in Calculation View Error
Hi Deepak,
I want to use Temporary table because I want to use Cursors in my SQL Script.
If I cannot use Temporary tables in Calculation Views then I have to re-engineer my script.
Regards,
Dimitris
↧
Re: Print Credit Memo
Good day
How does one properly configure a Credit Memo and an Invoice run. They are both linked to the same program but with different SAPScripts.
regards,
Darryl Naidoo
↧
Re: Cost View of projects not working?
Hi,
you could as well include the error status information in the project UI tab work via personalize.
Best regards
Otfried
↧
Re: cascading dropdown is not working in design studio 1.6
Hi Indrajit,
I have been able to successfully create a cascading filter similar to your scenario using property binding with a BW BEx Query as a data source. It should work the same way for a HANA data source.
The steps are as follows:
1. Data Source Initial View
Make sure each of the filter dimensions are set to "Only values with Posted Data" as shown below:
2. Property Binding
Configure the Source and Target property binding of each of the Dropdown filter components as shown below:
3. Application Output
The application output then looks like this:
All values:
Cascading filter selections:
Filter results:
4. Design Studio Version
In order to confirm your version of Design Studio, you can go to menu Help > About and then click the Installation Details button:
Regards,
Mustafa.
↧
↧
Re: SAP IDM - 'Approval Management' Tab in ADMIN Screen
Hi Matt,
Thanks this was also what I was thinking. Appreciate your response.
-Santi
↧
Re: Acessing PI OS filepath in Javaproxy SAP PI 7.4 single java stack
Hello NS,
Post the error screenshot.
Also make sure any firewall/port is blocking the FTP server access.
↧
Calendar View Format
It seems that when you add more than 3 activities with the same duration, or overlapping between, it only shows 3 of them (DAY VIEW-WEEK VIEW)
That is for the calendar appearance of SAP B1 v8.82. Same applies for v9.1. Is there something we can do to change that? I would like to avoid having the user click on "More" and see it on a list view.
↧
Re: Need help with UDF for Dynamic File Naming
↧
↧
Re: Notification Category Not Maintained
Hello,
Have you switch to another target notification type in V_TQ82 ?
Also refer SAP note
885476 - Program termination at creation of a PM/CS order notification
Just try by debugging the process
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar
↧
Re: Change log not updated in sales order
Hi,
Check by executing AUT10 in PRD for Transaction "VA02" in PRD. It will help in finding the changes recorded.
Regards,
SRK
↧
Re: How to add the group header on the next column if the group details spanning in multiple columns?
Hi Sam,
Since this is a continuation of this post: How to display each group at the top of the page in CR, I believe you're displaying each group on a new column, correct?
Repeating group headers on each column is not going to be an easy workaround!
Here's what you need to try:
1) Ensure that the height of the Group Header and the Details section are same.
2) Create a formula with this code and place it on the Details:
shared numbervar x;
x := x + 1;
3) Create another formula and place this on the Group Footer:
shared numbervar x := 0;
The purpose of the formula on the details section is to simply 'count' the no. of records that can fit on a single column.
For this example, let's assume 59 records can fit in a column. This number will be different for you, so you'd need to make a note of what the count displays on the last record of the column.
4) Once you make a note of the count, suppress the Group Header and insert a 'Details b' section. Ensure that the height of this new section is same as that of the Group Header.
5) Go the Section Expert > Highlight Details b > Click the 'up' arrow on the top. So 'Details a' is now blank.
6) Drag and drop the Group Header field on this blank section. The field should be replicated across the multiple columns.
7) Modify the formula in Step 2 to:
shared numbervar x;
if x < 59 then //replace this no. with the count on your report
x := x + 1
else
x := 1;
8) Copy this formula field and drop it on the 'Details a' as well. So you now have the same formula on Details a and b.
9) Go to the Section Expert > Highlight Details a > Click the formula button beside 'Suppress' and use this code:
shared numbervar x;
x > 1;
10) Right-click the formula field on Details a > Format Field > Common tab > Check 'Suppress'
11) Repeat Step 10 for the formula field on Details b.
I hope this helps.
-Abhilash
↧
More Pages to Explore .....
